Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: It simply considered and disagreed with the points raised by Izumi. in specifically addressing the effects of vacatur on third parties the cour concluded that the disfavored Izumi Izumi argues that the judgment of the Florida court should be preserved for purposes of collateral estoppel Izumi seeks the benefit of the Florida settl lement yet oks the benefit of the Florida judgment for its possible effect other actions Izumi does not dispute that it is 1 you a party to the unfair competition clains in the Illinois action (Pet A4 Thus, exercising its discretion to reject Izumi's claims, the of appeals Kpressly stated that vacatur was not automatic (Pet. It then ruled that Izumi's sole for opposing vacatur here the desire to have the judgments used in another action did not justify either dep ...
(.png)
